Letters FROM Chip: TX-21 constituents share Chip’s cut-and-paste replies

Every once in a while Chip’s staff will spit out a form letter explaining to his constituents why he is ignoring everything they’ve told him and voting in ways diametrically opposed to the values of his district. A few common threads stand out in these letters:

  • Chip really, really wants people to know he was a “former federal prosecutor”—even though the position he filled, Special Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of Texas, is an unpaid, volunteer position designed for young lawyers seeking “professional credibility.”
  • He calls anything he doesn’t like “a violation of the Constitution” or says it would somehow violate individuals’ “Constitutional rights.” He sometimes seems to be saying that it is unconstitutional for Congress to pass any laws at all.
  • Though the letters always include the same line about being glad to hear from constituents, they also order the recipient not to reply. They’re supposed to go fill out a form on his website if they want to continue the conversation. This is a tactic intended to prevent follow-up, so the recipient can’t hold Chip accountable for his vagueness, double-standards, and digressions from the real issues they raised when they contacted him the first time.

Reply to constituent’s request that Chip support the voter protection bill H.R. 1 

Here, Chip argues that the Constitution gives states have the right to disenfranchise voters:

The image is a letter, dated March 27, 2019. Two sections of text are highlighted in red boxes. The letter reads, "Dear [name redacted], Thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding H.R. 1, the For the People Act of 2019. I am always eager to hear the views of my constiuents, and I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your concerns. As a Constitutional Republic, our government is designed to empower the states to decide who they send to Congress to represent their interests. Centralization of power and influence in Washington wrks gainst the principles of federalism laid out by our founding fathers, and I will always fight to preserve those principles while considering any legislation. H.R. 1 passed the House of Representatives by a margin of 234 to 193." The following text in the letter is highlighted by a red box: "This legislation removed electoral authority and oversight away from th states, thus violating the Constitution and centralizing power in Washington. I voted against the bill and will continue to defend the Constitution and federalism during my time in office." End highlight. "Thank you again for your correspondence. I trust that you will continue to share your thoughts with me on other matters important to you. If I can ever be of assistance to you and your family, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chip Roy Member of Congress" The following text is highlighted in a red box: "Please do not reply to this email." End highlight. "To share your thoughts please visit my website.”

Reply to constituent urging Chip to vote to re-authorize the Violence Against Women Act

Here, “former federal proescutor” Chip weasels out of his pro-NRA vote by accusing a woman of “scoring points”—a pretty staggering charge from the man who shut down emergency aid to his own state just so he could net a couple of high-profile media interviews:

The image is a letter, dated May 24, 2019. Two sections of text are highlighted in red boxes. The letter reads, "Dear [name redacted], Thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding H.R. 1585, The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2019. I am always eager to hear the views of my constiuents, and I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your concerns. As a former federal prosecutor, I believe violence against women is unacceptable and those who commit violent crimes should be punished to the full extent of the law. I believe most Americans agree on that principle.” The following text in the letter is highlighted by a red box: “Unfortunately, rather than work across the aisle in good faith to craft a workable pice of legislation, Speaker Pelosi chose to politicize the reauthorization for the benefit of her own party. As a legislative body, scoring political points should not outweigh securing our rights and constitutional limits on federal power.” End highlight. “H.R. 1585 was hardly recognizable from the original passed in 1994. This reauthorization includes new provisions that extend the law beyond its core purpose and overly extends the federal government into traditionally state and local matters. Local leaders are best suited to enforce state laws and tailor programs and services to the needs of their communities. Thank you again for your correspondence. I trust that you will continue to share your thoughts with me on other matters important to you. If I can ever be of assistance to you and your family, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chip Roy Member of Congress" The following text is highlighted in a red box: "Please do not reply to this email." End highlight. "To share your thoughts please visit my website."

Summary of reply to constituent who suggested concrete actions Chip could take to solve the immigration crisis he constantly rails about

Here, Chip used one of his favorite moves: ignoring the specific, actionable information in the letter he received, to instead ride his favorite hobby horse of border security hysteria.

The image is a screenshot of a website comment. It reads, "I received two replies from Chip today. The first one was in response to a letter I sent last month protesting Trump wanting to include a citizenship question on the 2020 U.S. Census. I honestly tried to detect a thread of meaningful thought in Chip's reply, but I finally gave up as it was just gobbledygook. In my second letter I urged him to support bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform (including protections for Dreamers) along the lines of what the U.S. Senate passed in 2013 before being torpedoed by the then GOP controlled House. In his reply he completely ignored pathways to citizenship, permanent resident status and the right of people to apply for asylum - instead, he focused exclusively on border control. I wasn't surprised but this type of mindset isn't going to get us anywhere. #GoodbyeMrChip"

Dear Rep. Roy: TX-21 taxpayers can’t afford cancer drugs, but they helped pay for yours

October 23, 2019

Dear Rep. Roy,

I urge you to support H.R. 3, the Lower Drug Costs Now Act of 2019. House Democratic leadership released H.R. 3 on September 19, but it still needs amendments to increase the number of drugs eligible for negotiation and the number of drugs negotiated each year. The bill should also protect all patients from high launch prices and price spikes.

Will you commit to improving H.R. 3? Or are you still committed to the stance you took last May, when you said in a meeting of the House Oversight Committee, “To sit here and attack the capitalistic system that produces and distributes medicine that is saving lives around the world? I mean it is just offensive.” Do you find H.R. 3 “offensive” because it would prioritize the lives of AIDS patients over the $30 million bonuses of drug company CEOs? Do you think that laws preventing price-gouging on life-saving drugs are “an attack on the capitalistic system”? Do you know that two-thirds of Americans who file for bankruptcy do so because of medical debt? Do you care?

Can you explain how one of your “Healthcare Freedom Accounts“—the only actual policy you seem to feel is needed to solve our healthcare crisis—would help a diabetic whose insulin has increased in price 1200% over the last decade? Over 30 million Americans suffer from diabetes. Some of them live in your district. Are you unwilling to put their lives and solvency ahead of the interests of wealthy drug company CEOs?

The drug you’ve said you took when you had lymphoma, Brentuximab Vedotin, costs $4,500 per vial, over $100,000 for a course of treatment. When you were diagnosed with lymphoma, did you have $100,000 put away in a savings account for your healthcare? I assume you did not, which is why you were careful to keep your taxpayer-funded health coverage with the Texas Attorney General’s Office when you went to work for Ted Cruz. Most residents of your district don’t have state jobs, and can’t afford cancer drugs. But they helped pay for yours. If you want to square that account, you need to support H.R. 3. If you don’t, you’ll be telling the voters of TX-21 loud and clear that your health and wealth are more important than theirs.

Letters to Chip, 10/9/19: Defend the Constitution

October 9, 2019

Dear Rep. Roy,

The President of the United States, and the leader of your party, has now twice, on live television, asked foreign countries to interfere in the U.S. electoral process and aid his campaign for re-election. He has unilaterally betrayed our allies the Kurds in Syria, to the dismay of our own armed forces. His tweets and other public statements are increasingly deranged and detached from reality. He is manifestly unfit for public office, and if you cannot see this, you are too.

If you do recognize his dysfunction, and still support him, you are unfit to live in a civilized society.

You took an oath to protect the Constitution. That is far and away the most important part of the job you are being paid to do. If you fail to speak out publicly in this moment, and support the removal of this dangerous, corrupt president, you will take your place among those forever condemned in the history of our nation as enemies of democracy.

Letters to Chip, 10/9/19: Town hall

October 9, 2019

Congressman Roy:

I am calling on you once again to have a town hall in Austin. we hre at Indivisible have been misrepresented by some of your supporters as opposing your town halls in places like Bandera, where you are holding a town hall tonight. On the contrary, we think it’s wonderful that you are so supportive of your constituents in places that some politicians might think are too out-of-the-way to be counted. However, we in Austin are also your constituents, and we too deserve a town hall, a real one, not one held in a political safe haven like the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a place where some of your constituents might not be comfortable going simply because of who they are. No, we need a real town hall, one slathered in barbecue sauce or salsa, one that can be reached by public transportation, one like the ones you are having in other places, a town hall held in a public forum instead of the headquarters of a partisan think tank. If you are indeed running for office, or even if you are not, give us a town hall.

Letters to Chip, 10/9/19: Impeachment

October 9, 2019

Rep. Roy,

As per the attached letter from Ellen L. Weintraub, Chair of the Federal Election Commission, your President has violated the law and the U.S. Constitution, and as such, impeachment and conviction are both demanded.

If you fail to support impeachment, it will be proof that you are not a defender of the Constitution, the proponent of the rule of law or the patriot that you constantly make yourself out to be.

Rest assured, your patriotic progressive constituents will work tirelessly to see you defeated on November 3, 2020 for not standing up for what is right, good, and decent about America.

Impeachment Rally at Sen. John Cornyn’s Austin Office, 10/14/19

Before the Congressional recess ends, let’s make sure John Cornyn knows that Texans won’t stand for Senate stonewalling. We want the House’s impeachment efforts to be taken seriously, and we expect the Senate to act responsibly and remove Trump from office once his crimes are fully documented by impeachment hearings. Bring signs and gather on the sidewalk outside the building entrance. Small group visits to the Senator’s office upstairs may be possible, depending on staff.

Where: Sen. Cornyn’s Austin Office
221 W 6th St (Chase Tower)
Austin, TX 78701
When: Monday, October 14, 12:00 PM

RSVP at https://act.indivisible.org/event/attend-impeachment-august/148522